![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| New Zealand Politics Discuss all aspects of New Zealand Politics |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|||
|
New Zealand Herald Monday, May 30, 2011… A2
PM proud of sales plan “…..Mr Key said that whenever he spoke at Grey Power meetings, someone raised concerns about selling shares in state companies, and generally that concern was shared by the audience. But usually, most of the audience, when asked, had invested in a failed finance company, and when that issue was raised, they saw it from a different perspective, he said. It made no sense for New Zealanders to be able to invest in a KiwiSaver account and not be able to invest in a good New Zealand Asset.” Yes John- no sense at all- but the public already invested in the Assets that were “LAUNDERED” to become the property of these Business Interests. “LAUNDERED” as in those investments/interests have been concealed and transferred to become the property of a business Identity instead of perhaps being leased to those business interests – and now you want us to invest again John? You might be able to win over some flocks of toothless, poorly represented, voting sheep John but not all of us are so gullible. For Example some of us can read The Crimes Act 1961 section 243 money laundering- and relate better to the un mandated criminal activities of the New Zealand Government with respect to generations of investments in the Nations (not businesses) Infrastructure. That these investments now belong to businesses rather than the investors was a tidy little bit of LAUNDERING and clearly without limitations- John Why don’t you political fellows explain why these laws do not apply to those serving in positions of trust such as yourself John?- Are you trying to spread the risk of this Criminal behavior by ensuring the victims of Crime have a share in protecting the initiators of that Crime John? Come on John make it look good and get up there and state that “Nobody is above the Law” like your “Goff” mate did- we rarely do believe you thieving political clones John. But entertain us anyway… guess we can now see which party the Australian owned “New Zealand Herald” is likely to support eh- had to be one of the Criminal parties now didn't it- you should just stick to kissing celebrities posteriors on camera john . |